So Jeb Bush Is In But Can He Win-The GOP Nomination In 2016?

Jeb Bush (google image)

Opening Quote:  "I don't think a party can aspire to be the majority party if it's the old white guy party."- Jeb Bush


The former governor of Florida Jeb Bush officially announced his candidacy to a fired up crowd while attacking Hillary, Obama, and a few Senators also running for the GOP nomination in 2016. He seemed too be "beating around the 'Bush'" that Paul, Rubio, and Cruz can't fix the dysfunction in Washington when they are part of the problem. Bush vowed not too be another president who caters too Washington elites but instead a leader that challenges the negative culture embedding the nations capital.
So can Jeb win?

Where the rubber meets the road...

Yes! Jeb has the establishment backing and the biggest war-chest so it's a no-brainer. However in my gut and I feel possibly other conservatives agree- we want someone else!

Here's why:

(1) His last name- Jeb will be unable too move out from the shadow of the White House legacies left by his father and brother. Having 41, 43, and now possibly the 45th President from the same family seems a bit much. Furthermore whenever given the chance in the general election topics like the 2003 Iraq Invasion and financial crisis will be brought up.

(2) Common Core Education- I have heard it called "Obamacore" which doesn't sound good but I must admit too not being educated on the specifics. However my wife is a teacher and I understand  
there was not enough input from educators in the drafting and much was ignored when it comes too early childhood development specifically.
 Frankly though I don't even need too get into the "standards" because the Core takes away from states rights. It was created by private organizations funded by the federal gov't with no accountability too the taxpayers. Education cannot be fixed with a one size fits all "hat". One plan education for hundreds of millions across millions of miles cannot be good for the parents and students at the local level. That's why education was not intended to be the responsibility of the federal gov't in the first place.

(3) Immigration- I consider myself a conservative and I realize imperfect border security is better than no border security.
-I consider myself a conservative and I realize the GOP can't survive appealing only to white voters. (By the way I liked Jeb's speaking Spanish during his speech and holding the announcement at Miami-Dade was a good move. He will appeal to Hispanic voters which we need.)
-I consider myself a conservative and realize the status-quo on immigration is non-enforcement.
But...
Despite what he says I have this "gut" feeling Jeb's reform will be essentially amnesty and -I consider myself a conservative and am not for that.

Therefore,
Although I think Bush has the best chance too win against Hillary, should he get the conservative support? I just don't know. However we need too decide quickly so if he is the eventual nominee he will not be bloodied and wounded like Romney was last go around going into the general election. Hillary has already got the other side locked up and she's not even talking much less trading punches with a primary opponent. I find it unbelievable that a candidate running for president could have a strategy of not running too win. But it's working because she still wins in the polls. Incredible.

That being said...

My "head" says Jeb has the establishment, the money, and the resume (he was a good governor).

My "gut" says two biggies- education and immigration he's wrong on.

So Head or Gut?

A little advice for Jeb...

The first reason I wrote above of why Jeb couldn't win was him being a Bush and Americans desperately want to move away from another Clinton or Bush Presidency. However he and his advisors are handling the issue all wrong. Even a popular commentator on Fox (whom I respect) said Jeb was doing a good job distancing himself from the Bush name.

Wrong, wrong, wrong!

Doing things like making white posters with Jeb in big red letters surrounded by exclamation points is ridiculous. One of the things he has going for him is he looks presidential but Jeb sounds more like a mayor in the hills of Kentucky or West Virginia (no offense intended but you get the point).

Don't try too hide from the Bush name because it's impossible with the Democrats bringing it up every opportunity anyway. So instead of hiding, embrace it. Take out the venom's sting. Make the Bush name a positive. Be proud. Bush 43 is a better politician but Jeb is smarter and should no better. Both of them have big hearts and I think that's why he had trouble answering the "Iraq" question. He's listening too his advisors about what he should say or do instead of what he thinks.

Jeb, you love your family, your proud of your family, your family is part of who you are- so don't run from it. Americans like leaders who are proud and loyal to their family. It actually won't be that hard too flip it because the Bush family is popular with the American people. As far as his brother's policies Jeb has too convince America he's his own man but wouldn't he have too do that anyway?

As long as he's running away from the Bush name why shouldn't we?



Related Article:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jeb-bush-announces-bid-for-2016-republican-presidential-run/ar-BBlaZVm?ocid=AARDHP
 















    

Can Ben Carson Win The GOP Presidential Nomination In 2016?

Dr. Ben Carson (google image)

Opening Quote:  "It doesn't matter if you come from the inner city. People who fail in life are people who finds lots of excuses. It's never too late for a person to recognize that they have potential in themselves."- Dr. Ben Carson


Famous neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson declared candidacy in his hometown of Detroit with a theme of freeing our nation of the overbearing government it has become. Our federal government being responsible for just the few things our Founding Fathers intended can know longer be seen in the rearview mirror. Carson assured those in attendance at the Detroit Music Hall (which is not far from the school bearing his name) that he is not anti-government but that Washington has overreached in exercising constitutional powers.

Dr.Carson is not a career politician (which explains some of his controversial statements) but instead is the former head of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins. His work inspired the movie "Gifted Hands" where Carson performed the first surgery separating twins connected at the head. Dr. Carson also wrote the book "America the Beautiful" which translated into public speaking about conservative themes for example the National Prayer Breakfast in 2013. This is the occasion where conservatives embraced him after his criticizing of the nation's overall direction with President Obama a few seats away. 

So can Ben Carson win the nomination?

Where the rubber meets the road...

No! Don't get me wrong Dr. Carson seems to be a socially conservative and strong Christian man. He opposes abortion rights and "same sex marriage". All good in my book!

But...

there are three things in my view keeping him from having a chance. First Dr. Carson has zero foreign policy experience. In today's world with ISIS and Iran's Nuclear Program breathing down our nation's throat now is not the time for a novice. He said in a recent interview he had been studying up for a couple of weeks- it's not enough.

Second there is to many Christian conservatives already in his lane trying to get the nomination. One is Mike Huckabee who has experience not only as a governor but has already won primaries in Iowa and several southern states. Despite Carson being a non-politician which many are wanting the task will be too difficult. I just don't see it!

Third and I think most damaging- his controversial remarks. In reality other than his wonderful work as a surgeon the controversial statements is what he is known for. Again don't get me wrong he is right that political correctness in our country has gone the way of the nomad. Furthermore he has admitted the inappropriateness of some of the comments and blamed it on his not being a professional politician. Dr. Carson has stated it was now his intention to stay away from issues that might get him in "trouble" but I have a feeling temptation when dangled by the media will just be to great. Blaming the ridiculous level that political correctness has gone is fine for a conservative commentator but it will not fly as President.

On the other hand I could be wrong. Maybe his weakness in foreign policy can be overcome by surrounding himself with the right people and maybe the electorate wanting a nonpolitician is stronger than I think which will distinguish him in the crowded field. After all most polls show around 15% have no confidence in the federal government and around 80% are unhappy with Washington.

To be honest I am rarely wrong (joke!) but he seems to be such a strong Christian I almost hope that I am. Most of you are probably familiar with his more questionable comments so I want to give you some other quotes by Dr. Carson.

"I always pray for God's guidance in my life and he always provides it. He opens the right doors he shuts the right doors. And I have faith in Him."

"Those of us who believe in God and derive our sense of right and wrong and ethics from God's Word really have no difficulty whatsoever defining where our ethics come from."

"The most important thing for me is having a relationship with God. To know that the owner, the creator of the universe loves you, sent His Son to die for your sins; that's very empowering. Knowing Him and knowing that He loves me gives me encouragement and confidence to move forward."

So now you can see why I like him and he just might be able to fix our Health Care problems. Maybe his controversial remarks can be overcome? He certainly wouldn't be the first President to say controversial things. Didn't President Obama say things like:

1) He had visited 57 states with one left to go
2) We won't negotiate with terrorists
3) His administration would be the most transparent in history
4) Benghazi was about a movie
5) The IRS is not targeting anyone
6) If you like your family doctor and health care plan you can keep it- period

And finally my personal favorite after working almost twenty years with the mentally and physically handicapped.
7) He compared his Bowling score to those of the Special Olympics.


In Closing...
"Through hard work, perseverance and a faith in God, you can live your dreams."- Dr. Ben Carson


Related Article:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/05/03/ben-carson-president-republican-announcement/26633041/

If Clinton Is Eventually Pushed Aside Who's Up For The Democrats In 2016?

Jim Webb (google image)

Opening Quote:  "I learned long ago on the battlefields of Vietnam that in a Crisis, there is no substitute for clear-eyed leadership."- Jim Webb


If the democrats get nervous and decide not to board the Clinton Campaign Train then who are they going to ride with. Her success in early polls can be attributable to the fact she has 100% name recognition. In  fact I would argue it's her defining quality. President Obama proved elections are not won on name recognition alone.

But if not Hillary then who?

Okay I'm going to give you two alternatives that I believe are likely if Clinton has to step aside. Then I will tell you who I think democrats should go with. Also let me say these are not people who have a chance of overtaking Hillary like Obama did in 2012 but are only the last resorts if needed because she drops out. Dare I say there is no Barack Obama running this time for the democrats to dump Hillary for.

Let's take a look:
1) Former Governor Martin O'Malley of Maryland
First of all this pick may come partially from the fact I live in Maryland so I have seen or have been subjected to his leadership and  policies up close. I know he is a candidate who wants to be President but to me lacks the "it" factor needed too win. However he is very liberal. The powerful left will be happy with his stances on the death penalty, guns, and the popular "gay marriage" debate.

2) Howard Dean
I have written in a previous post that democrats might take another look at Secretary of State John Kerry. However unless the US/Iran Nuclear Program Talks turn out  a lot better than it looks now  that just is not happening. So I think Dean still has the necessary support from "Liberal-Land" if an alternative is required. Remember he was quite popular for a time back in the day. To me what did him in was that video at a rally where he unfortunately got a little too "excited".

Where the rubber meets the road...

Okay now for who I think the democrats should support if need be. None other than:
Former Senator Jim Webb of Virginia.
Okay I know the left will refuse to give him the nomination because of his stance on the "infamous" Keystone Pipeline alone but I'm  a conservative so why would they listen to me in the first place. The fact is Obama has pulled the party so far to the left Webb in my opinion is the best chance for the democrats to win other than Hillary. Libertarians will be attracted to Webb's chances of getting both parties to work together for the good of the country. As a decorated war hero with foreign policy experience he may be attractive to undecided voters in the general election with the current dangers surrounding us. 

"I know how to make decisions and I know how to lead."- Jim Webb

Two final thoughts:
1) For the democrats who like the liberal O'Malley if memory serves me correct he was not very influential in getting his Lieutenant Governor elected as he left office.

2) I know a Assistant Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Navy under Ronald Reagan does not sound like a democrat but remember Webb was against the Iraq War and Clinton and Kerry both voted for it.

In Closing...
"If I commit myself to something, I will commit my 100 percent."- Jim Webb


Related Article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/if-not-hillary-clinton-in-2016-then-who/2013/07/21/aa368564-f209-11e2-ae43-b31dc363c3bf_story.html

How Many Foreign Policy Failures Can President Obama Have?

President Obama (google image)

Opening Quote: "Iraq's future will be in the hands of it's people."- President Barack Obama ( It seems to me ISIS from Syria and Iran's Republican Guard are in control.)


President Obama's foreign policy is a mess!  The policies are incoherent, inconsistent, or altogether nonexistent. Let me list just a few results:

1) US/Iran Nuclear Program- I know some supporters of Obama might argue the final verdict is not in but everyone in the world knows the President is not a negotiator. I would argue the "framework" agreement, no matter which copy (US or Iran) your looking at is already in shambles.

2) Vladmir Putin- The Russian "Czar's" total disrespect for Obama and the US can in no way be looked at as a success. (Ukraine, Crimea, etc.)

3) Israel- President Obama has been disrespectful to our biggest and most important ally in the Middle East. What is the President thinking?

4) Syria- Even  former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thinks our lack of leadership cost us here!

5) Iraq- Good move not solidifying a status of force agreement. I'm sure not leaving appropriate troops behind will not invite chaos like ISIS (JV team).

Where the rubber meets the road...

The above list could have went on and on but I think you can get the idea. I know I should have mentioned "Benghazi" but to be honest I don't want too think about it. It still makes me mad!
I am not so gullible too think every administration's foreign policy will not be without it's failures but some things I just don't get. For example:

1) Why has President Obama given more respect to our adversaries than our friends?

2) What is his thinking with Iran? Just think about it! Iran is one of the leading sponsors of terrorism in the world. However instead of trying to block their power and influence we leave Iraq too let Iran sweep in too fill the void.  I tell you watching Iran and ISIS fight it out over territory once secured by American blood is infuriating! Whoever wins we lose!

The problem is President Obama has approached his foreign policy like a "community organizer". The concept of cooperation can only trump competition when everyone plays fair. When you have "big bullies" on every block playing "cut-throat" competition is the only game in town. I'm not saying there is not a place for diplomacy. However credibility is a must. Obama does not have it. When you "draw a red line in the sand"-mean it. Unfortunately in the spirit of cooperation he has let the "bullies on the block" walk all over us.

Frankly his take on things might work for a tiny country in the middle of no where. However we are the United States of America. A superpower with responsibilities to the world. Don't get me wrong I am for being prudent and realistic but you cannot deny "American Exceptionalism" which Obama has done. Like it or not the world looks to us for guidance and we cannot lead from behind for our sake and the world.

Last thought...
Due in large part to President Obama's foreign policy failures America is seen as weak and in almost all cases perception is reality.

In closing...
"Al Qaeda has been decimated."-President Barack Obama  ( Today they hold more territory and power than ever.)


Related Article:  http://time.com/76868/obama-foreign-policy-cynicism/

                                                                                                           

So Can Marco Rubio Win The GOP Nomiation?

Marco Rubio (google image)

Opening Quote:  "The Hispanic community understands the American Dream and have not forgotten what they were promised- that in the U.S., a free market system, allows us all to succeed economically, achieve stability and security for your family and leave your children better off than yourselves."- Marco Rubio

On Monday Florida Senator Marco Rubio officially announced he's running for President. The son of Cuban immigrants, Rubio spoke too a crowd gathered in his hometown of Miami at the iconic Freedom Tower. The Tower, also known as the "Ellis Island of the South" holds personal meaning for Rubio as well as others in the Cuban-American community. Fleeing from Castro's Regime tens of thousands of Cuban immigrants were once processed by the federal government at the historic landmark.

In Rubio's speech he expressed that he was the candidate to defend the American Dream hoping to appeal to young, minorities, and less affluent voters. Trying too take advantage of his youth he said it was time for the new generation to take the reigns in the new century. Rubio felt it was time for older leaders with older ideas too step aside. He specifically mentioned how Hillary Clinton wanted too take the Country back too yesterday when it should be about tomorrow.
So the question is can Rubio win the GOP nomination?

Where the rubber meets the road...

Rubio is one of the most conservative members of Congress which should bode well for him in the primaries. However one of the "biggie's"- immigration remains a question mark. That being said I am hoping with him being Cuban-American he can lead the way for the Republican Party too connect with Hispanic voters. I believe, despite the immigration "barrier", the GOP must bring Hispanic voters into the party or winning elections will be more and more difficult. There are a great percentage of Hispanics that agree with Republicans on most issues but immigration continues too divide. Hopefully Rubio could help bridge the gap.

 As I have stated in a previous post the future is now so I hope he can at least be given a chance, but right now I kind of see Rubio stuck in the middle. Although he is very conservative I believe he would have a chance in the general election. Rubio is young, handsome and could pass as a democrat just looking at him. Remember JFK? Rubio has a Presidential presence about him. I have seen him speak where he came across as very "cool" which will be beneficial and the few times where he was a bit "nervous" I chalk up too youth. He will just get better throughout the process. So can Rubio win? Yes! I think the real question is can he lead?

In closing...
"You cannot give up on the American dream. We cannot allow our fears and our disappointments to lead us to silence and into inaction."- Marco Rubio


Related Article:  http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/13/politics/election-2016-marco-rubio-presidential-campaign/index.html

Who Will Be The GOP Nominee For President In 2016?

(google image)

Opening Quote:  "If you're sick and tired of the politics of cynicism and polls and principles, come and join the campaign."- George W. Bush

I realize it's extremely early but let's ponder who might be the Republican nominee for President in 2016. We certainly have a number of candidates to choose from seeing everybody and their brother seems to be throwing their hat in the ring. With so many possible contenders who do you think will eventually breakout as the front runner. Right now it seems to be Governor Walker from Wisconsin but I don't think it will last. Most polls show everyone under 20% so the nomination is essentially there for the taking.

I'm sure numerous contenders will have their day "in the sun" but who will be standing in the end?

Where the rubber meets the road...

Frankly I don't know! My guess is no one else does either it's just to early. That being said I will give you some of my thoughts:

Will it be...

Former Governor Mike Huckabee- No! He certainly knows how to win the Iowa Caucus which might give him some traction early. However after Huckabee's stint on the Fox News Channel, with a show which I liked by the way I just don't see the necessary "fire in the belly" to get it done.

Governor Scott Walker- No! I do respect what he's been able to do in Wisconsin which is probably why he's leading many polls now. However in the end I see him as a survivor not the President.

Senator Ted Cruz- No! I like him a lot because he's a true conservative. However he is to disliked by many powerful republicans after the "shutdown" mess. As always America says they want change but Cruz is just to conservative. His loyal base will keep him around for awhile but his loyal base ultimately won't be enough.

Senator Rand Paul- No! Although I could be wrong. He's got fundraising skills, infrastructure in early states, and a plan. Paul means business and is playing to win. I must admit I like his "gumption" but I find him a little "strange". I can't put my finger on it but I just don't see him as President. Also foreign policy?

Jeb Bush- No! I know deep down he probably is who everyone thinks will eventually be the GOP nominee. Bush has money and the establishment behind him. However I will give you two negatives:  immigration and he's a Bush! I respect the Bush family but three Presidents in thirty years from one family. I just don't see America voting for that!

So are you ready for my early pick?

Senator Marco Rubio- Yes! I know what your thinking but it's early so why can't he be my pick? He may be young and inexperienced but if a community organizer who gave one good speech at a democratic convention be President why not Rubio? He's very talented, from Florida an important state, and I think ready for "primetime". To be honest the GOP can't afford to wait. If Rubio can hang on long enough maybe others will jump on the bandwagon. The future is now or at least needs to be!

Last word...
My guess for vice president:  Governor John Kasich from Ohio.

In Closing...
"Honesty, integrity, and accountability, the values, which should be the hallmark of this government, have instead been thrown under the bus by an arrogant majority, casualties in a misguided campaign to shield from accountability those who abuse this House."- Louise Slaughter

Related Article:  http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GOP_2016_GUNS?SITE=WIJAN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT















   

Can Senator Rand Paul Win In Run For President In 2016?

Senator Rand Paul (google image)

Opening Quote:  "Just because a couple of people on the Supreme Court declares something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so."- Rand Paul

On Tuesday, April 7th, Senator Ron Paul from Kentucky announced his campaign to run for the President of the United States in 2016. He vowed he would never become part of the Washington "machine" when elected. In Paul's speech he touched on many topics:  low taxes, term limits, balance budgets, and a job for whoever wants to work. As for as the "hot" topic of the US/Iran Nuclear Agreement Paul believed any final version must go before Congress for approval. In polls the Senator seems to be doing as good or better as other candidates against likely nominee Hillary Clinton.
So can Senator Paul win the Presidency?

Where the rubber meets the road...

No! I will give you one reason Paul can't win the Presidency:  he can't win the GOP nomination. Some of Paul's earlier statements make conservatives nervous. He comes across as an isolationist with troubling views on foreign policy. It's not a good time considering ISIS and Iran's Nuclear Program.

I'll give him credit for attempting to change his old perceptions. However in reality it's going to backfire. While trying to appeal to the Republican establishment types he has irritated some early supporters like those who supported his father in 2012. If you remember Ron Paul was able to "stir the pot" back then. Unfortunately the changes in direction ultimately makes him look like a flip-flopper. Paul needs to build on his father's success not diminish it. In the end though it will come down to the importance of foreign policy issues this election that will make the difference. Paul won't win.

On the other hand...

Although I stand behind what I wrote above, Senator Paul's broad themes of cutting spending and getting the government out of the way will connect with voters. Also despite what I wrote about his flip-flopping I believe many will understand the reasons why he's doing what he's doing therefore still see him as "authentic" when it comes to their beliefs.

In closing...
"If you hear me out, I believe you'll discover that what motivates me more than any other issue is the defense of everyone's rights."- Rand Paul


"LIMITED EDITION"-"I vote! Do you?"-t-shirt-click here:  http://teespring.com/proud-to-vote


Related Article:  http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/07/politics/rand-paul-president-2016/index.html



 

What About This US/Iran Nuclear "Framework" Agreement?

(google image)

Opening Quote:  "A diplomatic solution that puts significant and verifiable constraints on Iran's nuclear program represents the best and most sustainable chance to ensure that America, Israel, the entire Middle East will never be menaced by a nuclear armed Iran."- Joe Biden

A tentative deal has at least on the surface finally been reached between the U.S. and Iran after what has thus far been an exhaustive process. June 30 is the date agreed upon for this "framework" to transform itself into a final deal. President Obama told America this "understanding" is historic and when all the technical difficulties are worked out Iran will be prevented from making themselves a nuclear bomb. Supposedly Iran's nuclear program will be confined to peaceful purposes only.
Really?

Where the rubber meets the road...

First of all the two sides don't seem to be looking at the same "tentative" agreement. If this is the case how could even a "framework" be any kind of achievement. Iran is claiming once the deal is signed sanctions will immediately be lifted while the White House is saying sanctions will be phased out based on performance.

Iran also is suggesting they will in no way be subjected to "snap" or surprise inspections. Furthermore any conclusions reached by investigators can be disputed. Meanwhile the White House is telling us the investigators will be on Iran and their facilities like "white on rice".
Really?
Were the U.S. and Iran even at the same negotiation?
How big is Switzerland?

It troubles me that what President Obama seems worried about most is that if Congress interferes the U.S. will be blamed for the failure.
Really?
That is what most concerns our President?
I mean when was the last time Iran operated in good faith, and we will be blamed? Come on!

I am troubled with lifting sanctions too quickly. Once Iran solidifies economic deals it will not be that easy to just put sanctions back in place because doing so would also affect the other countries involved. I'm sure the U.S. will be blamed for that as well.

It seems I remember President Obama saying Iran must end it's program but they seem to be a long way off from that. I'm sure Iran really wants lighter sanctions but my guess is they really, really want a nuclear weapon. You combine that with Iran's history of untruthfulness and lack of cooperation, what kind of deal could really be reached. Also as President Obama might say I have a feeling our negotiators are the "JV" team on this one.

In conclusion...
"The world should be very clear about making sure that Iran does not get nuclear weapons, period."- Benjamin Netanyahu

For your "LIMITED EDITION" Tee click here:  http://teespring.com/proud-to-vote

Related Article:  http://www.timesofisrael.com/ex-iaea-deputy-deal-puts-iran-on-nuke-threshold-for-10-years-then-gets-worse/

Will Hillary Clinton Be Tough To Beat For President In 2016?

Hillary Clinton (google image)

Opening Quote:  "Take criticism seriously, but not personally. If there is truth or merit in the criticism, try to learn from it. Otherwise let it roll right off you."- Hillary Clinton

There's no doubt former Secretary of State Clinton will not only be competitive but difficult to beat for the Republicans in the 2016 Presidential election.. Most GOP opponents face major disadvantages according to polls. Sure at this point name recognition plays a role but the margins have a wide gap in general election match-ups.

Clinton definitely seems to have all but secured the Democratic Party's nomination. She is leading most possible opponents by fifty points. Furthermore if Senator Elizabeth Warren decides not to run the lead expands even further. It's fair to say three out of four democrats think Clinton is the best choice for the ticket. Will her email scandal eventually diminish her chances in 2016 if it continues to go unresolved?

Where the rubber meets the road...

Despite evidence to the contrary I don't think Clinton will end up running. Yes the "Email Scandal" is a problem with Senator Gowdy from SC on the warpath. He's upset about how the whole "Benghazi" ordeal went down and frankly so am I. I know Clinton all but said certain aspects didn't matter but it does! That being said the fact that previous Washington officials have done similar things when it comes to emails I believe Clinton could eventually get past it. Also all the money the Clinton Foundation has received from other Countries like China is certainly questionable but I'm sure she has prepared for that already.

 So your probably asking yourself why I think Clinton's not going to run. The truth is I believe the liberal media is not on her bandwagon. They are on her heels about her difficulties instead of finding ways to support her. Sure the media will not make it look obvious especially given she has the best chance of the democrats to win but they are not behind her. I don't know why exactly. Maybe it goes back to the way she ran against Obama or her dismissive attitude. I think it's because the media has been there and done that and want someone new. Whatever the reason there is some sort of "grudge" that I believe will not only keep Clinton from winning but she in the end won't run at all! Want to know my theory? Well I believe the real reason they don't want Hillary is because...get ready... drumroll please... she's a woman. Can you believe that. The powerful liberal left don't want her because she is a woman. Hillary is not the feminist that the left want to see as the first female President. Why? Blame Monica Lewinsky, that's what Hillary did remember!

In Closing...
"Always aim high, work hard, and care deeply about what you believe in. And, when you stumble, keep faith. And, when you're knocked down, get right back up and never listen to anyone who says you can't or shouldn't go on."- Hillary Clinton

One last thought... Okay, given the above quote forget what I said about Hillary not running, of course she will even if certain "powers that be" would prefer anyone else. First if she don't run for the democrats who in the heck will they put up? So despite the fact she is not a good campaigner, speaker, and lacks the "it" factor they will be pressure for her to run. But beware! Remember what happened in Iowa when "they" found out white people would vote for Obama? In case you forgot Hillary got dropped like a "hot potato"! It could happen again.

Get "Limited Edition" Tee! Click here:  http://teespring.com/proud-to-vote



Related Article: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/lara-brown/2014/12/04/the-reasons-why-hillary-clinton-shouldnt-run-in-2016

 

                               

Could Texas Senator Ted Cruz Win The GOP Nomination For The 2016 Presidential Race?

Ted Cruz (google image)

Opening Quote:  "Voters are hungry for principled, conservative fighters, because the threat to our liberties from Washington has been better."- Ted Cruz 

On Monday March 23, 2015 Texas Junior Senator Ted Cruz officially entered the 2016 Presidential Race. He like the other possible contenders have been campaigning for months but Cruz is the first to make it official. Sen. Cruz made the announcement to a welcoming crowd at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.

 In his speech this presidential hopeful praised America and it's people. He vowed to stand up and lead the fight to make America great again. Is it possible he could get the nomination?

Where the rubber meets the road...

No! I think there are a couple of reasons Sen. Cruz will ultimately fall short of winning the nomination. First, despite the fact it is extremely early he has a disadvantage when it comes to name recognition. So far most people associate him with the "government shutdown" a few years back when his uncompromising stance angered democrats and republicans alike. This also reminds voters  of his lack of experience although that may no longer matter given President Obama won.

 The second and most important reason he will fail to get the nomination is Cruz is looking for the Christian Right as his base. Yes he will have some Tea Party supporters but the evangelical's votes are going to be spread out. It's obvious Sen. Cruz is counting on Christian conservatives given his kick-off speech took place at the institution founded by Rev. Jerry Falwell. It is understandable given that Cruz's father is a pastor and his in-laws are missionaries. But the cultural conservative realm will be crowded and votes will be hard to come by. Former Senator Rick Santorum emphasizes his faith and former Governor Mike Huckabee used to be a Baptist preacher.

 So in the end despite giving a valiant effort Sen. Cruz will come up a tad short. However he is very smart and impressive and this experience should set him up to run next go around or if I am right the time after that. I believe a Hispanic Senator from the great state of Texas sounds like a perfect vice presidential running mate. We shall see!
By the way did I say he was smart? When he gave his kick-off speech at Liberty he delivered it without a monitor. Impressive!

In Closing...
"We are seeing a great awakening. A national movement of We the People, brought together by what unites us, a shared love of liberty, and an understanding of the unlimited potential of free men and women."- Ted Cruz

Get this "Limited Edition" Tee! Click here:  http://teespring.com/proud-to-vote



Related Article:  http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/ted-cruz-great-president-reasons/2015/03/30/id/635304/

Will Bergdahl Be Executed For Desertion And Related Charges?

Sgt. Bergdahl (google image) 

Opening Quote:  "Every army in the history of the world has always had some deserters, usually much greater than we have today, because once again every soldier who's joined the Army since 1973 is a volunteer, and the numbers are very small and they are almost completely for--people desert almost completely for personal or financial reasons."- Bryan Hilferty

Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl was held captive in Afghanistan for five years. The Army is now charging him with desertion and related charges that could imprison him for life. The military announcing the charges awoke passions among Americans from when he was initially released. Bergdahl's freedom came with the price of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

Where the rubber meets the road...

The White House has been using the "no man left behind" excuse which makes the term "hogwash" come to mind. Maintaining the belief that if Bergdahl voluntarily left his post and went for a stroll in Afghanistan it was still "our" duty to free him is ludicrous. I mean Susan Rice was at it again when she was talking "honor and distinction" while Bergdahl's unit members were telling how he left willingly and they had to look for him, thus putting lives at risk.
If found guilty will Bergdahl be executed?
No, President Obama and the White House are not going to execute someone that cost a swap of five Guantanamo Bay detainees.

What I can't figure out is...
Why in the world the President would want to make the exchange in the first place?
Did he really want the potential future terrorists released that bad?
Was the fanatical left putting the pressure on the lapsed campaign promise that stressing?
In any event why the "rose garden ceremony"?
I mean the White House had to know most of the desertion talk and such.
Didn't they know whether or not the Army would back their play?
It comes down to either incompetence or ignorance. Pick one!

In Closing...
"These deserters were our undoing. I shall have a good deal more to say about them before I finally lay down my pen, and I shall not hesitate to call them by their true name, the name with which they will forever be branded before all the nations of the world."- Christiaan Rudolf De Wet

Related Article:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-116391.html

Is The Christian Right A Force To Be Reckoned With In The 2016 Presidential Race?

Christian Right (google image)

Opening Quote:  "There's no doubt that the Christian Right has gone to bed with the more conservative elements of the Republican Party. And there's been a melding in their goals when it comes to the separation of Church and State."- Jimmy Carter

If the applause being received by likely candidates like Mike Huckabee, Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Bobby Jindal, and Ben Carson are any indication the Christian Right are gearing up in preparation for the next Presidential election. The "Powers that be" are encouraging Pastors like never before to become politically active. Having the power and say a united front of church congregations could provide is more important now than ever. A desire for Christian Heritage needs to be restored because failure in electing socially conservative candidates is taking it's toll. Will evangelicals be up to the task?

Where the rubber meets the road....

I have personally never been a big fan of pastors delving into the realm of politics. It wasn't so much the idea of separation of church and state but I realized Christians disagree about what the Bible says so Politics would never promote harmony thus hindering His Kingdom. For Christians, especially pastors it's about Christ and spreading the Gospel not about influencing who someone's voting for.

However I am beginning to change my mind, at least a little. Our Country is broken! Although I still don't approve of politics being discussed from the pulpit I do believe pastors have a right to play a role in the political process as does every American. Reverend King was pivotal in Civil Rights so it has been necessary in our nation's past. History tells us God blesses his people when they follow Him under a Godly leader which is in contrast to Him withdrawing prosperity under ungodly leadership. Hundreds of years ago when people left England so they could worship as He intended God blessed us with the birth of a great nation.

So it is not surprising as we continue to turn away from God our country suffers. We need a Christian President who focuses and trusts in Jesus instead of succumbing to political fears and intimidation. It would be a comfort to me to have a President who I believed truly took his cares to the Lord and was not ashamed to go to seek his guidance for help.
How about you?

In closing...
"I don't think the Christian Right dominates America in the way some of the media believe they do."- Billy Graham

Related Article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/indiana-and-the-defining-divisions-in-american-politics/2015/03/31/082b6bde-d7bf-11e4-b3f2-607bd612aeac_story.html

Is Email Controversy Really A Joke To Hillary Clinton?

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Is Time Running Out For Succcessful US/Iran Nuclear Talks?

Secretary of State John Kerry (google image)

Opening Quote:  "The Obama presidency has two great missions:  fixing the economy, and preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons."- Benjamin Netanyahu

As US Secretary of State Kerry tries to deal with Iran's nuclear program the gaps preventing
a deal remain. There has been some agreement when it comes to some of the technical issues but reaching the goal by the deadline will be difficult. The structure must be agreed upon by both parties by the end of March. The State Department continues to report talks have been constructive despite issues of transparency, verification, and sanctions.
Will Iran's economy continue to suffer?
Will Iran develop a nuclear bomb?

Where the rubber meets the road...

 White House officials have stated the chances are around fifty percent. The way I see it there is going to be a deal. The only alternative leads to war. It's just a mess really. Iran wants sanctions lifted immediately after a deal is struck and the US wants to see proof of their compliance first.

 Who would be the first to give in? My guess is President Obama which is why even some Democrats agree Congress must approve any deal. If a deal is not reached and the US decides to increase sanctions it will not do much good if Russia and China don't come along. They won't! Iran will continue their nuclear program and Israel will eventually take action.

So to avoid war Obama will find some way to get a deal done even if it's not a good one. I know the 47 GOP sending the Iran leadership that "warning" letter didn't help matters but neither did President Obama pleading with the Iranian people directly to accept a deal. To be perfectly honest I am not to concerned about the particulars of a deal since Iran will end up breaking any deal with the "infidels".

Congress is trying to pass legislation that requires their approval but I'm sure the President would just veto it anyway. So in the end we will have some sort of deal. My guess if the deadline passes they will just continue to talk until something gets done. Nothing solves problems like deciding to just kick the can down the road.
What do you think?

In Closing...
"So I think we should stay focused on the real problem in the Middle East. It's not Israel. It's these dictatorships that are developing nuclear weapons with the specific goal of wiping Israel away."        -Benjamin Netanyahu

Related Article:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/31/world/iran-nuclear-talks/